Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by daniel-cussen 1685 days ago
Real economies are made by saving even 8.5% of the cost of an airship's gas. That's real money. Plus, that hydrogen won't escape the vessel over time, so that's a percentage you don't have to keep refilling.
3 comments

Helium diffusion is a good point though. If you’re right at the edge of non-flammability and you lose some helium over time…
Its about your customer's perceptions of risk. Key line: "Are the cost savings by using a 8.5% mixture of hydrogen worth all the trouble and effort it will take to convince your customers that the mixture is safe, as opposed to avoiding the safety questions altogether by using 100% helium?"
Why would the hydrogen not escape?
Diatomic hydrogen is bigger than helium, less prone to diffusing through a membrane.
Leading to an increasing percentage of hydrogen that will exceed the danger threshold. Helium level will need to be monitored and replenished.
You have to monitor and replenish no matter what.

That's part of why the comment said "a percentage" you don't have to refill.

Have you worked with hydrogen? Being less prone to leaving than He is an extremely low bar and very far away from the claim that it doesn’t ever diffuse through anything.
Diffusion works both ways, too. Oxygen outside of the membrane will also slowly diffuse into the hydrogen and helium mix, further complicating any attmpts to remain non-combustible.
Sure. And none of this prevents hydrogen from escaping.
That’s true, but it isn’t a claim I made.
No, but the post I replied to, and apparently you felt the urge to reply to my comment. But I now understand that you did not intend to contribute to the discussion, thanks for the clarification!
The comment you replied to was mine though…