|
|
|
|
|
by blacklion
1689 days ago
|
|
Wayland is pushed by people, who do embedded Linux. Think: infotaiment system in your car. All UI is pre-installed and fixed to one (maybe, custom) toolkit, custom "window manager" (and it is not full-featured WM, as X11 ones are, as you can not move and resize windows arbitrarily), one theme, no remote access, very low response time.
It is better than both X11 and plain framebuffer in this role, for sure. |
|
Maybe when Wayland was started. But X.org is now effectively unmaintained and most of the core X.org developers are now working on Wayland. From the release maintainer of X.org:
So here's the thing: X works extremely well for what it is, but what it is is deeply flawed. There's no shame in that, it's 33 years old and still relevant, I wish more software worked so well on that kind of timeframe. But using it to drive your display hardware and multiplex your input devices is choosing to make your life worse.
https://ajaxnwnk.blogspot.com/2020/10/on-abandoning-x-server...
See also:
https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=XServer-...