Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by teraflop 1686 days ago
For many years, they were consistently and very diplomatically saying that they had no plans to offer Backblaze Personal Backup to Linux users, because Linux users would use a disproportionately large amount of storage and it wouldn't make sense to offer them a flat-rate alternative to the pay-per-GB B2 option.

e.g. https://www.reddit.com/r/backblaze/comments/jsrqoz/personal_...

It seems that they may be changing their tune, at least as of a few months ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/backblaze/comments/m3xynu/backblaze...

1 comments

As a linux user, i have just setup my own backup solution to backblaze using Rclone and their S3 compatible storage.
Which is fine and all, but then you're paying per gb/month. Depending on how much you want to back up, it can cost you a lot more than the personal plan.
Eh, im storing about 1.3TB of photos, its costing me around $10/month. That is an acceptable cost IMO.