[0xDEEPFAC]

its a working compiler, so why not?

[Jtsummers]

It’s a glorified sed script with a forked version of GCC from April 1st. It’s a joke.

[0xDEEPFAC]

It is not? As the creator I can tell you that the parser and analyzer of GCC/GNAT were modified.

For example, supporting implicit "use" clauses for packages was a difficult problem to solve - not to mention allowing for abbreviated type names in the Standard package.