| >Not least of which is that no one calls "natural" immunity psuedoscience—it's how the vaccine works. I’m sure that’s how it was intended to work but the term you’re looking for is artificial immunity or vaccine derived immunity. Unfortunately the vaccines don’t confer immunity so there goes that. >What happens when we reach a critical mass of health workers quitting? For not consenting to a vaccination mandate? We’re all about to find out. Can you imagine working on the front lines for over a year to suddenly be discarded like a piece of trash because you won’t take a vaccine (when you are almost certainly already immune)? >The transmission argument similarly falls short given that the vaccine reduces the odds of you becoming a vector in the first place, or progressing to the point you require state intervention to survive Speaking of disingenuous... I’m not sure why people gloss over the fact that the vaccines don’t prevent transmission. Why fumble over word games instead of acknowledging the simple fact that you don’t get immunity from the vaccine. Now follow that train of thought to it’s logical end. Universal forced vaccination of everyone on Earth with passports to boot and the outbreaks still continue. Well hey at least we have this neato “world ID” (vaccine passport) which couldn’t possibly be used for nefarious means. |
This is one of the MAJOR things that make me concerned about the vaccine. A leaky vaccine almost seems worse than none at all, to me. (Just look at mareks disease in chickens)