|
|
|
|
|
by throwawaysea
1694 days ago
|
|
> in practice mean that only the rich could have children Yes that is what it might mean, but that also seems like the right incentive to me. I would argue the rich are more deserving of having children in a world with constraints. Wealth is money accumulated by getting others to voluntarily give it to you in return for valuable goods or services. Therefore it is very literally a measure of value to society. It seems morally justified to let those who produce more value to have the privilege of raising children if we have to limit it. Also, I don’t think those parents would necessarily be too busy - most probably work 9-5 like anyone else. |
|
How do you reconcile the concept of land ownership, inheritance, and rent-seeking with your world view?