|
|
|
|
|
by nostrademons
1700 days ago
|
|
I think that a lot of the motivation for flash loans is that they democratize capital-intensive arbitrage attacks, making the attacks happen sooner, making all of the insecure contracts fail fast and improving the overall security of the DeFi ecosystem. In other words, it's supposed to make platforms fail and people lose money, because each hack exposes a bad contract and takes it out of the environment. If flash loans didn't exist, then an entity with sufficient capital can still alter prices and exploit differentials in borrowing costs to profit. This is a common complaint about the mainstream financial system - examples include market corners, short squeezes, George Soros breaking the Bank of England, or the Fed artificially lowering borrowing costs for the U.S. Treasury. But they're limited to people who already have a billion dollars. Flash loans let everybody have a billion dollars, so that if there's an arbitrage opportunity you don't need capital to take advantage of it. |
|
I can already hear my grandma say "I'm glad I lost all my savings, now the platform gets safer."
Apart from that, it's naive to think that this makes the ecosystem safer. We still have SQL injections and XSS in the wild even though everybody should know how to avoid them after literal decades of exploits.