|
|
|
|
|
by klodolph
1687 days ago
|
|
Why would I assume that the research is wrong? We’re talking about a century’s worth of readability research, here. Cheap, easy-to-replicate studies which have been done over and over again over the decades. Backed by simple-to-explain theories that explain why. Seems like a completely unreasonable assumption, to be frank. |
|
Because it's highly that even if it's correct in aggregate, there will be outliers that the opposite is true, and they'll benefit from different formatting.
That is, even if it's right, it might still be wrong for them. So the question being asked is, why is it made so hard to change?