Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by likpok 1696 days ago
Later caselaw (note that that case was from 1919) gives directors widespread latitude to decide what "benefiting the corporation" means.

The second paragraph gives two such cases: AP Smith Manufacturing Co v. Barlow and Shlensky v. Wrigley.

1 comments

This actually just makes it worse if (plausible) Zuck is a sadist.