|
|
|
|
|
|
by tolleydbg
1695 days ago
|
|
|
1. I didn't realize that anyone thought thought the service was launched. I've only seen reporting that it was discovered and defaced. This would make a difference. 2. and 3. The license can say whatever it wants and we can interpret it however we want, but at least for US law, it makes a difference whether or not this constituted a release/distribution to be a binding agreement. Non-binding contracts are not enforceable. If you have reporting that it was used by consumers, then this is different, but this doesn't seem to be the case. |
|
|