[kodah]

I think you have a point, however, there's a fair amount of folks that think news coverage is just fine. I'm sure where you use the word collude those folks use the word "collaborate".

The way I understand it is this: if you have multiple companies covering the same topic using their own channels, then someone has to try to stick out in the variety. This could be good or this could be bad. There's a lot of ways I can think to interpret that image, but I'd say it's probably planted to agitate liberals. That's a company trying to stick out in a negative way.

If they work together, they can produce common narratives -- even if they're wrong, but especially under certain pervasive ideologies that may be trendy at the time. The whole Covington incident and the outpouring of blind rage was a fairly good example of this very thing. Entire reporting fueled off of a tweet and other companies speculative reports. This tells me there's something deeper wrong, or at least - this is not the place to institute a patch.

For those that need an update on Covington: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_2019_Lincoln_Memoria...