| >wouldn't it probably mean expanding the bureaucracy a lot too? Not really. Like with most laws we rely on peoples willingness to follow them. >But then, since most of them aren't agents of the foreign government Those that take actions on behalf of a foreign government and have a connection to that government are by definition foreign agents. >expense to decrease tax revenue. What good is tax revenue without a stable government to spend it? >Do you want people with dual US/Israeli citizenship to register under a revised FARA, or do you want them to choose between the two? That's up to them. All I'm asking for is disclosure. Merely a disclaimer. >problem if you want to target I don't want to target anyone. I just want it disclosed if their actions are on behalf of a foreign power. >Ostensibly, I think for security clearances, they already take dual citizenship into account. If it is worth disclosing in that case I don't see the harm in having some more honesty generally. |