Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by benatkin 5420 days ago
Would there be any problems (aside from the people who've cloned this git repo already) if you got rid of the -branch in branch names? Seems awfully redundant in git. If not, I think it would be an improvement and the sooner the better!
1 comments

I think the reason the branches are there is because the master/root is bleeding edge.
Please read again, benatkin talked about names.