|
|
|
|
|
by Lycanthropos
1703 days ago
|
|
Wikipedia is more dangerous, because it appears as legitimate and credble when it is not. For the most part it is a more formal front-end for all newspapers and journaling sites, further promoting the already-prevalent western cultural biases and mouthpieces. Most of the edits are made the same people (organizations?), that are in the double digits. I never trust anything I read on wikipedia, not even for so-called objective issues and common facts, because there are always interests hiding behind even the least controversial topics. Just read the sources it provides, and even then it's flawed because they pick and choose the ones that fit their narrative best. |
|