[Toutouxc]

No, because the pre-spinning (torque applied to rotor) part happens on the ground with the rotor blades set to low/no pitch. The rotor then starts freewheeling (no torque applied or transferred from the rotor) and the blades' pitch angle is increased, which slows the rotor down, but momentarily creates enough lift to lift the autogyro into the air, where it immediately transitions to forward flight.

[mrfusion]

I always assumed the main benefit of an auto gyro was a fixed pitch main propeller for the simplicity and cost benefits.

I guess if you could attach the vehicle to the ground and spin up the propellor and then release you could get the same effect.

Or another option is if the rear propeller could turn its rudder against the spin direction.

[tweedledee]

It’s still simpler and cheaper. The swashplate is much simpler. Much less power is fed to the main rotor as inertia is built up slowly and only for take off. The lower standard of reliability as worst that happens is you don’t take off. Engines are pushing a more forgiving higher speed prop, so engines and fuel are cheaper.

I don’t know how marginal jumpstarts are, possibly very, which would limit the utility. Especially where there is a runway nearby.

[mrfusion]

Wow neat approach. I’m always surprised auto gyros aren’t more popular. They seem so versatile.

[Toutouxc]

They also have some extremely dangerous flight characteristics.[0] To be fair, helicopters are even worse, but they require extensive training and are known to be dangerous.

[0] https://youtu.be/CfjBzrSDrV0