Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by 0des 1695 days ago
You simply need bigger pipes to ingest more traffic than the attack can provide. It is presumed these days that packet analysis in some cases can require too much power costwise rather than scaling up the connection to swallow it.
1 comments

And the "further up the chain" you can move the mitigation, the easier that is. Mitigating on your box requires a huge pipe to your box, but if your provider can mitigate at their border router, well those are bigger and already have huge traffic to and through them.

And it's in their interest to talk to their providers and mitigate even further back if possible. And some mitigations are relatively easy (block all DNS traffic to this subnet, etc).