|
|
|
|
|
|
by sofixa
1700 days ago
|
|
|
> At work, we've looked into committing tarballs (we're using yarn 3 now) but that also poses some challenges (our setup isn't quite able to deal w/ a large number of large blobs, and there are legal/auditing vs git performance trade-off concerns surrounding deletion of files from version control history With Git LFS the performance hit should be relatively minimal (if you delete the file it won't redownload it on each new clone anyways, stuff like this). |
|
|