[davidw]

No:

> I expect all of my coworkers to be protective of their work-life balance and I'm dismayed whenever I see them prioritize work in a detrimental way.

I agree completely, as a parent. I don't expect non-parents to put in extra time. Kids certainly do give you "real time deadlines" that can't be moved or pushed out of the way, but I don't expect to work any less because of them.

[lugged]

Those real time deadlines that take you away from your work is what they're talking about. You leaving for those deadlines means someone else implicitly needs to pick up the slack.

Or at least that is the argument.. but there are a few assumptions here that aren't true. Namely, someone doesn't need to pick up the slack, the work will be there the next day in most cases. Someone else with kids might be around. If your boss is treating you different it's on you to call it out and move on.

[dleslie]

> You leaving for those deadlines means someone else implicitly needs to pick up the slack.

It really doesn't. That's only the case in an abusive work environment.

[stevenicr]

Wouldn't this really depend on the job?

Maybe there is a assumption up thread that it's a tech office job being discussed?

But many jobs, if you had to leave to pickup kids because a bus brokedown, a no-change deadline - and you were working the afternoon shift at a wendys. digging trenches for a sewer line, paving a road, processing a line at an ER - all sorts of jobs - I think there would be no choice but for others to pickup the work being skipped.

So I think it's very job dependent. Even some tech jobs probably can't just be postponed till the next day.

[dleslie]

We're on hacker news, most everyone here works in tech.