[nobody9999]

>Any sane person would support free speech principles. Harm from restrictions of free speech far outweighs harm from hate speech, etc.

A reasonable position. And one I, for the most part, support.

However, the other side of that coin is that private actors (i.e., not the government, at least in the US) have free speech rights too. And that includes the right not to allow or support speech on their private property.

As such, if you attempt to force private actors to host/support speech they do no wish to host/support, then you are violating the principles you espouse.