|
|
|
|
|
by sleepysysadmin
1703 days ago
|
|
>I don't see what communism has to do with everyone needing to be employed full time. That's just what they made of it in the USSR etc. Like your definition says: and each person contributes and receives according to their ability and needs. That equates to everyone working. There's very few exceptions, usually like you lack arms and legs or something extreme to allow you not to work. Afterall, how do you stop 'You work, I'll be at home collecting UBI and watching TV.' |
|
Well, if there's no money (because it's not necessary), there wouldn't be a UBI anyway? Communism is supposed to come after socialism and before anarchy, in theory. First you build an egalitarian society with a mindset of peaceful cooperation, then you get them to all work together for the greater good, and finally you dissolve the 'taskmaster' of the state, as society is perfect and no longer needs it.