|
|
|
|
|
by smurpy
1695 days ago
|
|
Hi Hussam. I really like the hTime idea! The compelling perspective on this, for me, is to see it as a planetary frame of reference for thinking about time. Of course there is UTC but we don't casually and habitually speak about UTC because it involves "conversion" (between our own TZ and UTC) and "disambiguation" (what what, are we talking about UTC here? gotta check the TZ, ah, yes). The way your hTime differs is that it uses new a new alphabetic nomenclature for the global time, so it carries the signal right on its face that it is this new system. Definitely a subtle point, but I think a reasonable one. It'll be great when hTime "faces" for smart watches are available. That would speed adoption by making it easier for people to start "living" in planetary time. Personally, I'm all about this planetary cognitive context in my own work, so I have sympathy for the challenges you're dealing with landing the message of the value that hTime offers. Good luck and keep it up, it's an important innovation. |
|