We don't have it. The system I describe should be less about interacting with others and convincing them that they are wrong, and more about allowing me to explore my own ideas and find the core principles that underlie them. I'd be fascinated to have a system prompt me with questions about my position, point out where my thinking isn't joined up, tell me what my sacred cows are. Some positions I'll be able to back up with a reference to a statistic, others will boil down to "I just think it, but I don't know why". A system that points out where I use a word in two different ways, a kind-of unintended bait-and-switch inside my own head. Because so many heated debates end without resolution because both parties are talking past each other with different definitions of words and phrases. We're so hung up on specific words that we'll flip a table when someone says the wrong thing, even if there's no intended malice, because it wins the argument or gets someone blocked/banned. Important discussions descend to the level of "well if that's what I am what are you", "you can't triple stamp a double stamp, Lloyd", "LA LA LA LA LA LA".
Where do we have this system that simply lacks funding?
Where do we have this system that simply lacks funding?