|
|
|
|
|
by iammisc
1707 days ago
|
|
Sex is very different. Last I checked, no matter how much construction work you do, you will never construct another person, even by accident. Sex is not just another activity. Due to its effects of potentially creating a new human being, it is a category unto itself and deserves special treatment. For example, would you sell your pancreas? Why not? Is it because a vital organ is not in the same class of goods as say a lightbulb? The same is true of selling sex, which is not just some social interaction, but a social interaction that can literally make a new person Your kind of equivocation is morally lazy and conveniently abiological. |
|
Speaking of lazy, that's a pretty ridiculous comparison. Depriving yourself of a vital organ is not the same as renting out your genitals for a limited time.
"Making a new person" is also a complete red herring. You can hire a surrogate to carry a baby to term, which is also paying to use someone else's genitals to actually make a new person. The only meaningful difference is the absence of "sex", so I think it's clear what you really have a problem with.