|
|
|
|
|
|
by SquishyPanda23
1701 days ago
|
|
|
Ah okay, that makes sense then. Sorry about my confusion. I don't know the motives of the original poster. Since the article was about how the top 10% own ~ 90% of the stock, I assumed the relevance of the income tax figure was that it was related to its impact on wealth inequality. |
|
|