|
|
|
|
|
by dgb23
1711 days ago
|
|
Contributions are another one I think. Both the authors and potential collaborators might find it more attractive to use their language of choice. Compilers also tend to pose a variety of challenges that force one to really dig into a language. |
|
I know it's entirely other end of the language spectrum, but I think that's why Typescript got successful while Flow did not; Typescript is in Typescript, while Flow is in OCaml. And nobody knows OCaml.
OTOH, eslint is making waves now and it's in golang, so. Who knows.