Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by charbonneau 1704 days ago
TLDR;

Immunologist isn't convinced of risk. Cites not peer reviewed laboratory evidence.

1 comments

NPR accordingly and responsibly titled it "might not be", yes.
Not sure if it’s reasonable. My gut interpretation (before reading the article) was “breakthrough infections are overblown”.

I prefer their alternative headline “What the latest COVID research says about breakthrough cases and transmission”

That's the correct interpretation, should the preprints survive peer review and further research support the early indications.