And the document writes "45.8" as their yearly VOC emissions rate from that pretreatment plant, page 44.
Do you see any reason to disagree with this 45.8 number?
------
If you do have beef with other blogposts / other things (It seems like you want to talk about the power plant), you're welcome to do so. But my earlier points in this thread are rather specific to this #16 blogpost.
Do you see any reason to disagree with this 45.8 number?
------
If you do have beef with other blogposts / other things (It seems like you want to talk about the power plant), you're welcome to do so. But my earlier points in this thread are rather specific to this #16 blogpost.