Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by wizard-beta 1707 days ago
Relevant, from deep in the footnotes of a 1820 edition of Nennius I found in a used bookstore

>Not only men, but women were thus occupied, to whose insufficiency the defects of many manuscripts are assignable. (P. Sarti de Profess. Bonon.) This authority refers to the female scribes of Bologna. We may, however, believe the practice to have been general; for Engelhardus (anno 1200) reports an accident which happened to a nun in the exercise of her employment: "Cum soror una cui usus erat scribendi membranam, dum ad lineas punctaret subulam incaute trahens, oculum transfigit." Defective transcript is, however, not solely to be attributed to females; for the accurate and elegant Petrarch indignantly exclaims, "Who shall prescribe an effectual remedy for the ignorance and worthlessness of copiers, who spoil and confuse the performances they undertake?---At this time, every one who can redden letters or guide a pen, though void of learning, skill, or ability, assumes the character of a scribe. I should not censure their defects in orthography (for that is a long forgotten art,) if they would faithfully transcribe what is before them. They might betray their insufficiency, but we should have in the copy the substance of the original. They now confound both together, and, by substituting one thing for another, we can scarce identify the author from which they transcribed. If Cicero, Livy, and many other illustrious writers, could return to life, and re-peruse their own compositions, would they understand them, and doubting the whole, would they believe them to be their own, or rather, those of some barbarous people?"

2 comments

> Cum soror una cui usus erat scribendi membranam, dum ad lineas punctaret subulam incaute trahens, oculum transfigit.

Ugh! :-(

I didn't know about this part of the process of manuscript preparation. Apparently, awls were used to score or rule the guidelines onto a parchment, or to perforate an entire set of parchment leaves with very tiny "pricking" marks showing the desired spacing for the guidelines (which would then be identical on every page in that set).

http://web.ceu.hu/medstud/manual/MMM/ruling.html

So that explains "punctaret" (a very post-classical word).

"Then one sister, whose custom it was to write parchment, while she was carelessly carrying an awl in order to prick the lines, impaled her eye."

David Bull (in one of his YouTube videos [1]) relates a piece of similar advice he was given. An old carver advised him when he was younger to never scratch his face with his carving hand. Apparently accidentally impaling your eye is enough of a risk to make this safety habit an oral tradition.

[1] https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCKSrgKjevPmNZxCAyTZP5cQ

Back in the days when one did "paste-up", I removed my X-Acto knife from the work with a flourish, and it stopped in my thigh. There was no significant damage, but I was more cautious after that.
With minor modifications I frequently feel that way about various current writers, analysts, bloggers, vloggers, podcasters and influencers (of all genders)