|
|
|
|
|
|
by ModernMech
1712 days ago
|
|
|
No one said anything about legality. I'm still going to yell at you to gtfo and never come back again, and I don't see why it would be surprising that I would. Let's drop the metaphor. The original story was that someone accessed a number of documents they weren't supposed to but technically could, and the question was whether or not that it was reasonable that the owners of the documents were upset with that. I argue there was good reason to be upset given the facts on the ground. In this particular situation, the original poster was there to access their own document. Having accessed someone else's document, that would be the point at which the behavior crosses from legitimate to illegitimate if it continues. Leaving at that point would be one appropriate response. But systematically going through a number of different documents goes beyond a mistake and into the realm of intentionally exploiting this security issue for unauthorized purposes. That's when it crosses from "honest mistake" to "dishonest exploitation". I have no idea about the illegality of the issue. But the fact is plain that this person was not the intended recipient of the documents, they knew they weren't the intended recipient, and then after realizing the nature of the exploit, they continued to use it. This is not the same as knocking on a door for a legitimate reason, being let in, and then the person inside being mad you're there. It's knocking on a door for no reason or a malicious reason, knowingly doing something inside the resident doesn't want you to do, and then wondering why they are mad at you. |
|
|