|
|
|
|
|
by markenqualitaet
1713 days ago
|
|
There is no threshold for harm*. It's a cost:benefit consideration. From a cancer/aging perspective, any amount of UV exposure is bad. Tanning is a consequence of DNA damage. If your skin gets darker from sun exposure, you see evidence of your skin cells reacting to increased DNA repair signals. Malignant transformation/senescence is a stochastic event of course, but age markers pretty much suffer in a dose dependent manner. * Of course exhausting antioxidant capacity will greatly increase damage at a certain point. I am not exactly sure if UV light can cause single strand breakage by itself, or via ROS, but antioxidants are no "shield" in any case - more like a minefield. |
|
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cytochrome_c_oxidase (no mention of red light therapy in this article).
UV light from the sun comes with plenty of red light. UV light from the tanning bed does not have any red light. In the winter I used to go tanning, then would spend 12 minutes in the bright-light room [1].
[1] at Planet Fitness. The company website doesn't have any information, but I found this page: https://thelifevirtue.com/total-body-enhancement-pros-and-co...