|
|
|
|
|
|
by lentil_soup
1708 days ago
|
|
|
yeah, but that's what I mean, if it's just a side effect then how is it relevant to the whole "illustrious history" of the UK comment which was defended by saying that the colonies are now "freer". How is that an argument? If I enslave a group of people, force on them my language so they can follow orders and 500 years later that language opens doors for them, how am I "illustrious"? it's a side effect of an inhumane act. Trying to twist this so my history doesn't make me uncomfortable is historical immaturity. |
|
|