[root_axis]

I'm still not understanding the problem. If webpack doesn't suit your needs then don't use it. If your employer's technical leadership picks technologies based on fashion rather than suitability for the problem that's not a failure of the technology, that same problem surrounds literally every popular technology irrespective of its technical properties.

[hsn915]

Are you serious? Here's how you sound to me:

My poop is on the street. If you like it, you can use it. If you don't like, don't use it. What's your problem? If someone shoves my poop down your throat and you don't like it, that's not a failure of my poop. That's a failure of human relationships.

[root_axis]

Your analogy is laughably absurd. Poop on the street is a public health hazard, someone shoving poop down your throat is assault. Comparing such things to free open-source software is borderline trolling.

[hsn915]

Isn't it great that you can refute any analogy by finding a literal difference between the analogy and thing being explained?

[root_axis]

Isn't it great that you can defend any bad analogy with a reply that no analogy is perfect? Your analogy makes no sense at all.