|
|
|
|
|
|
by louissm_it
1710 days ago
|
|
|
I’m sorry but no. The future costs of nuclear are comparatively irrelevant if you consider the immediate doom our climate and thousands and thousands of species are facing because of burning fossil. If a 100 nuclear disasters happen in the next 5 years it will still do less damage than coal. There is simply no more time, the only option is to stop burning at any and all costs. |
|
|