| > But this doesn't make a difference either because now the man can stop going to the ball blasting session. It makes a huge difference. Actually it changes everything. With male birth control, there are 4 possible outcomes: 1. Man and woman don't use birth control.
Conception is likely.
2. Man uses birth control. Woman doesn't.
Conception is unlikely.
3. Man doesn't use birth control. Woman does.
Conception is unlikely.
4. Man and woman use birth control.
Chance of conception is astronomically low.
Notice how conception is only likely when both partners want it.When only women have access to effective birth control, they have a lot more leverage and therefore power: 1. Man has no birth control. Woman doesn't use hers.
Conception is likely.
2. Man has no birth control. Woman uses hers.
Conception is unlikely.
Currently, the choice to have children rests almost entirely on the female. All she needs to do is secretly stop her birth control.> The main issue is trust, and why are you having unprotected sex with people you don't trust in the first place? Trust should not be necessary for a matter of this importance. Children should only be born when both partners consent. It's as simple as that. Also, condoms are not particularly effective at contraception. The statistics assume perfect use and that doesn't happen in reality. Their main purpose is protection against sexually transmitted diseases. That isn't perfect either. |
Let the fairer sex have some power