|
|
|
|
|
by jakelazaroff
1709 days ago
|
|
It’s not true that Record will result in a type where any key is valid. If you pass in a primitive like string, then of course any string will be valid. That’s not Record’s fault; what you’re doing is essentially creating an index signature [1]. If you pass a more restrictive type in as the key, it works as expected: type Tips = Record<“foo”, TipObject>;
const tips: Tips = {}; // error, needs key “foo”
tips["foo"]; // fine
tips["bar"]; // error, no key “bar” in tips
It’s worth mentioning that this isn’t just an issue with objects. For example, by default, the index type on arrays is unsafe: const arr: number[] = [];
const first: number = arr[0]; // actually undefined, but typescript allows it
If you do need an index type and want to account for undefined keys, the idiomatic way is the noUncheckedIndexAccess compiler flag [2], which will automatically make any index property access a union with undefined.[1] https://www.typescriptlang.org/docs/handbook/2/objects.html#... [2] https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig#noUncheckedIndexedAc... |
|