Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by fartingflamingo 1715 days ago
Knowledge of "Roman cement" roughly speaking was never really lost.

How do you think the quay walls in medieval Dutch and Flemish harbours were built? The mortar was made with Trass [0], a natural puzzolanic from the Eifel, transported along the Rhine.

"Roman cement", also known as hydraulic lime [1] mortar, was in widespread active mainstream use in many places in Europe until the 1920's, and in some the 1930's. In Latvia for example, large scale Roman cement production only came to an end with the second world war flooding specific quarries.

The main problem with these hydraulic cements is they cure/set much more slowly. That's very much guaranteed to limit their use in speed focused modern construction.

There's still a market for hydraulic lime mortars. There's even a euro norm for it, EN-459. These products have excellent breathability and moisture resistance properties. The entire field is seeing a revival in monument restauration and ecological construction. Most straw bale construction in Europe for example is plastered using hydraulic lime plasters.

Some interesting products:

- natural hydraulic limes (NHL), like Saint-Astier from France

- formulated/artifical hydraulic limes (HL), often using blast furnace fly ash

- natural puzzolanic additives, like trass from the volcanic Eifel, has been used continuously since the Roman era!

[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trass

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hydraulic_lime

2 comments

I think it's worth pointing out that whilst hydraulic limes have good breathability compared to cement, they are still inferior to "air" lime based mortars (e.g. hot mixed or made with lime putty). Although these have a slower set than hydraulic limes they are still in widespread use and a lot of straw bale construction will be using air lime as a superior alternative to hydraulic lime.
In what way are they inferior? There are a lot of properties of building materials, and correct selection is about the compromise based on what each has. Cure time is one consideration, cured strength is another, R value, mass/volume ratio - and those are what I as a lay person can come up with: I suspect someone with more knowledge as a longer list.
I guess the parent commenter meant to say hydraulic limes are inferior in terms of breathability compared to hydrated lime. Which is entirely correct.

As always, it's a trade-off. Anecdotally, we did the base plaster layer on our straw bale house using hydrated lime for better breathability. We'll probably make the top coat slightly hydraulic using trass.

I've been looking into straw bale construction just out of curiosity recently, do you have some good resources to learn more about construction and regulation?
One book I like is "Building with straw bales" [0], by Barbara Jones. It's mostly very practical. Reassuring also when it comes to using a less usual building technique. A tad bit to the eco hippie side for my taste, but only in minor details. All the important bits are very much grounded in sound practice.

If you want to gather practical experience, come help me fiddle with our straw bale house next spring or summer :-)

[0] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/23281280-building-with-s...

Thank you, and sadly the eco-hippie vibe seems to hinder a lot of otherwise good ideas from spreading.
Regulation is going to be particular to your municipal or county government. Unless you’re in a major city, the permits desk will probably be approachable and will take the time to explain what you can and can’t do. They will probably entertain a variance unless you seem like you’re really out of your depth. They may be able to tell you about other bale construction in your area.