[didip]

No way, Go is beautiful based on this 1 metric: It always looked the same regardless who wrote it.

It makes PR review job so much easier, and to me, that's beautiful.

[erik_seaberg]

You're wasting your experts' time if they cannot write (or reread) clearer, more concise code than your beginners.

[ohCh6zos]

> It always looked the same regardless who wrote it.

This is Go's biggest anti-feature to me. I can't stand that all code in Go is so similar.

[deltasixeight]

Ease of reading is a practical feature not a beautiful one. If you think practicality is beautiful well great.