|
|
|
|
|
by Lammy
1713 days ago
|
|
> The backend API calls are all serverless and instantiated on request. I think the "Jamstack" is the single worst trend to ever happen to static site generators as both an author and a reader. The whole appeal of static sites to me is that all the files can live in one place. As a site author this minimizes the number of failure points and things I need to pay for, and as a reader it minimizes my trackable footprint online since connections only need to go to one place. The "Jamstack" throws all of that out and encourages people to glue together as many third-party APIs as possible that they get to keep paying for forever and that cast the surveillance net ever-wider around readers. Of course nothing stops people from Missing The Point and throwing Google Analytics on a totally-static site, but "Jamstack" normalizes that behavior. This is the opposite of progress. |
|
To be fair jamstack does not imply 3rd party APIs. A valid jamstack could all be on your own premises, just that every API is deployed independently.