[johnchristopher]

Jeez, the vitriol here.

People are jumping to conclusions and bashing jamstack/static without checking the source (it's not a static blog, it's ghost:node+sqlite/mysql) or reading the article (it's not about the blog, it's about https://hillcroftlacrosse.com).

[corobo]

People were jumping to make jokes about the site being down

We could not see the article, source, or that link.. the site was down

[pipnonsense]

> "We could not see the article, source, or that link."

That's exactly the point of saying people are "jumping to conclusions".

[corobo]

Yes jumping to conclusions to disprove OP is a popular joke format that the internet seems to dig

You and the top level are doing the same but to the commenters- it's just one step further down and I feel the jokey aspect has been lost in favour of the internet's favourite response type: mild outrage over nothing

Ooh we could call it a MOON response

[pipnonsense]

Sorry, I could not understand most of what you meant, but regarding that I am "jumping to conclusions" too I disagree.

Comments making fun of a site praising jamstack being down are jumping to two conclusions: the site is itself is using jamstack and the praise of jamstack is for use in blogs. That's what the commenter above pointed out.

When I point out that these commenters are jumping to conclusions I am not jumping to conclusions. It is pretty clear that they are associating the use of jamstack and the site being down.

[corobo]

Aye I rushed the comment, no worries

[ridings]

Honestly this thread is my favourite.

My blog isn’t Jam. It’s a ghost on T2.micro. This hit the FP and it didn’t like it.

Can’t help but think if it was Jam it wouldn’t of gone down. Then again I like the editor for ghost.

Either way, I’m not protective over Jamstack, this whole situation is ironic and funny.