[mcantelon]

>Regarding your first question, what are you implying was their motive for doing this, if not for safety?

Disrupting protest would be an obvious motivation. The less effective the protest, the less bad press for the transit authority.

[yummies]

Read what happened last time there was a protest by this group: http://sfist.com/2011/07/12/bart_protesters_chant_vandalize_...

This is not your typical peaceful protest - BART was probably more concerned about preventing trains from being blocked, vandalism, and safety. And about safety - in this case, it's not some euphemism for control. These are train stations where people stand on a platform inches away from trains going at high speed. A rowdy crowd in a space like that is definitely a threat to safety.

I think of it BART taking away one of its amenities in order to maintain its core services and responsibility to safety than a draconian abuse of force. It's like a coffee shop that turns off its wifi because of abuse. Cell 'towers' placed in BART tunnels and stations are provided for the convenience of customers (as previously pointed out, not for safety).

For what it's worth, I ride the BART twice a day, every week day. I would choose train service over underground cell service any day.

[wot]

This makes perfect sense to me, and I agree. The crowd that was protesting is just a bunch of 20-something hipsters who see rioting and revolution in the rest of the world and want in on the fun.

If you threaten the life of a police officer, expect to be shot. That's all there is to it. These people are just looking for something to cry over.

To people saying BART did this to prevent bad PR: I'm not convinced of this. Everyone knows that doing this would cause an uproar, simply based on the fact that they get their panties in a bunch over acceptable police action.

If you want to protest, go to the streets. You don't have to clog up commuters' travel and make their day shitty. Kmart doesn't have to let you congregate inside their stores. BART doesn't have to let you congregate in the paid area.

Also, I think it's a bit ridiculous that people can write off any claim if it has to do with safety. You guys really think that it would be safe to have protesting in a train station?

[mcantelon]

>If you threaten the life of a police officer, expect to be shot. That's all there is to it.

If that's what actually happened, sure, but it's interesting that they refuse to release video of the event.

http://articles.sfgate.com/2011-07-05/bay-area/29737621_1_ba...

[nowarninglabel]

I don't have a position on this, but I don't agree with comparing it to a coffee shop. BART is a governmental entity paid for by taxpayer dollars, shutting off a service that was provided by said mandatory tax dollars is different than turning off an additional service at a private business.