|
|
|
|
|
by aquark
5422 days ago
|
|
I've been using the beta for several months now and it has worked great across a variety of Windows and Mac machines. For things like music and photos where I have 40+GB of accumulated bits it feels a better option than a straight cloud based system like DropBox or JungleDisk (which I also use, but for a smaller amount of stuff). I have a number of machines with many GB of spare disk space, so rather than paying monthly storage fees for back up, I can just use this to replicate rarely changing content. Since machines on the local network sync at LAN speeds it is also very fast in the usual case. |
|
On a LAN, I don't really see the advantages over something like FreeFileSync, which is GPL'd.
Over the 'net, locating the machine and performing NAT traversal can be useful, though, especially for people behind ISP NAT.