|
|
|
|
|
by beerandt
1716 days ago
|
|
Because you're still allowing people who can transmit the disease around these "vulnerable" patients. And the line drawn isn't even an arbitrary number, but an arbitrary policy with an assumed improvement. An improvement that we know isn't good enough to prevent spread in populations with near 100% vaccination rates. |
|
It doesn't need to be 100% effective at stopping spread to be an excellent idea.