|
|
|
|
|
by pyinstallwoes
1717 days ago
|
|
Your certainty in it not existing to a level of alarm is just as ridiculous as your argument that "Tesla, et al" are lying of the capabilities of AI. Yes, most people do not know what the difference between ML, AI, neural nets, and computation is - nonetheless we've reached the point in humanity where there is no question a pandora's box has been opened. There is very real reason why there would even be gag orders on public information given an entity achieved some level of strong AI. And to your point of it just requiring more training, yeah, it kinda is that simple for the majority of tasks which is also enough to offer serious contemplation. A very wide depth of weak AI solutions that fake "strong ai" will probably be more dangerous long-term than a true "strong ai" solution due to the fine-tuning problems it would naturally have. Big discussion, overall we need to be less certain on the state of things because there is very good reason why such an event would _not even be obvious when it happened_. A time of uncanny valley at the most and then you realize oh shit, AI has been running the world since... APT and DDoS patterns. |
|