|
|
|
|
|
by marton78
1717 days ago
|
|
He was convinced that without an American preemptive strike, even more would die. He was wrong of course, as we now know, but it wasn't clear at that time. There's an episode of Hardcore History on this topic, I think the title was "Destroyer of Worlds". |
|
He was noted by his colleagues to be exceptionally unperturbed by his work. He recommended that the US strike Kyoto despite having no military significance to speak of.
He himself admitted that he was ideologically violently opposed to the existence of the USSR. It's clear that his motives were not about minimizing death and destruction.