|
|
|
|
|
by kazen44
1723 days ago
|
|
this comments hit up a good point, the lower in the OSI stack you go, the harder it is to initiate change. There is still some (mostly industrial) hardware that has lackluster TCP/IP support at best (for instance, assuming the netmask is always a /24...). migrating these networks to ipv6 is not possible, and doing 6to4 adds a crapton of complexity. |
|
We can, and do, make massive , non-backwards-compatible changes in layers 1 and 2 every few years and no one is the wiser. Layer 3 is special. It makes that flexibility in all the other layers possible, but keeps none for itself.