|
|
|
|
|
|
by ninjaranter
1724 days ago
|
|
|
Highly recommend this Matt Levine article on how ludicrous that is https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2021-09-09/money-... > Imagine writing the investment memo for “20% of a picture of a dog” and being like “the most we should pay is probably about $2 million because the whole picture of the dog sold for $4 million three months ago and it can’t realistically have appreciated more than 150% since then; even if the whole picture of the dog is worth, aggressively, $10 million, this share would be worth $2 milllion.” > One model here is that everyone on earth wants to pay $4 million for a unique picture of a dog, so if you make one unique picture of a dog and sell it for $4 million you’ll get $4 million but if you cut it into 17 billion slices each one will sell for $4 million? |
|
|