[wizard-beta]

A distinction should be made between banned books that were actually censored by governments, and "banned books" that merely featured in pathetic political quarrels at American middle schools and whose "banning" consisted of a school board of boomers removing them from the school library

[colpabar]

It's funny that the latter description is probably just as accurate for the people who banned To Kill a Mockingbird as it is for the people who banned Stamped: Racism, Antiracism, and You, given that the two groups are probably diametrically opposed to each other politically. Both groups seem to have a problem with depictions of racism.

[kiba]

Schools are part of the government.

[wizard-beta]

So? If the extent of the "ban" is discontinue of availability at a middle school by the authority of a local government or citizen school board in Oklahoma or some such place, it is still a very feeble form of censorship that I don't find interesting at all - just as I'm not interested in what books are or aren't available at the premises of any other local Oklahoma government department building. Anyone can just buy these supposedly banned books themselves if they want to read it. It's not comparable to books that are actually banned.

[Miner49er]

These bans probably mostly effect kids, who are probably the least likely people to be able to buy the books themselves.

[Amezarak]

Yes, the annual banned books list is essentially a list of books favored by the averaged ideology of education majors, librarians, and journalists. There is never anything actually suppressed or controversial on the list.

I'm not even arguing that truly censored books do have intrinsic merit, but the banned books list is just a list of books certain people want you to think are edgy and that you should read to advance their ideology. It's marketing. Amazon and other bookstores are actually banning books, often in collaboration with government funded NGOs. 95% of these books are actual trash fires, sure, but those are banned books. On top of that, public libraries are performing slow, partly ideological purges of existing collections - there's probably more books being permanently destroyed/lost today than in the history of mankind.

[kiba]

These listed books are nonetheless targeted. Yes, they are basically books people want to read, but busybodies complain about these books, not the garbage fire of books that nobody will ever bother reading.

[Amezarak]

There are plenty of busybodies running the school libraries ensuring books people would read never get bought and purging collections of books now deemed heretical.

There are plenty of busybodies lobbying bookstores to stop selling books.

These books don't, or rarely, make banned book lists. It's done quietly out and out of the public view. The books that get shilled as 'banned books' are all largely (not wholly) books agreeable to a particular class of people.

For example, a very popular children's author who passed away some time ago is completely banned from my library system for ideological reasons.

[camjohnson26]

Yeah seems like this should have made the list. https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/books/2021/03/0...

[mcphage]

> For example, a very popular children's author who passed away some time ago is completely banned from my library system for ideological reasons.

Which author, and which library system?