|
|
|
|
|
by walterbell
1732 days ago
|
|
> Whats the point? You'll just debunk it with a bs "fact check" There's a PhD waiting for someone who can do an "influence analysis" of points and counter-points diffusing through articles, social media debates, fact-checkers, counter-articles, etc. Including methodologies to differentiate bots, paid PR firms, machine learning analysis/targeting, and organic participants being influenced by all of the above. Those who have been involved in a few of these debates can almost predict the graph of responses, as you did with the fact-check lookahead parser :) |
|