Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by VanillaCafe 1726 days ago
Nice. And now the museum can create a piece of art in response called "Repercussions". (Or, maybe it was all one piece of art all along.)
3 comments

I like it. They could request the judge that he serves his time inside the museum itself, in a cell prepared just for him where visitors can observe his daily routine. He will not only participate in one of the greatest modern art performances of all time, but he will indeed become the artwork.
And at the end they could burn the artist and issue an NFT.
An NFT? More like one NFT for every of his screams while he's burning to death, and they wouldn't record any so the screams can't be duplicated.

1 year later... the artist is alive and well, enjoying a mojito on a Cuban beach with a satisfied smile.

It's almost like you're saying that an NFT doesn't actually capture the thing it's correlated with. But if that was true it would completely undermine the concept of an NFT of an art work. The NFT wouldn't have any more unique value than an item # in a catalog.
That would actually be pretty interesting as art, I think.
I beg you, if you have gotten this far, watch this 10 minute video about the above link - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_8xhdL8BPvU

It's one of the most entertaining things I've seen this year.