|
|
|
|
|
by monocasa
1725 days ago
|
|
> does not bind the amendment to apply only to the establishment and protection of a body designated as the militia It does, but only because US code says that there's two militias. The organized militias (the National Guards), and the unorganized militias consisting of every able bodied man 17-45. Since the 14th amendment was written later, that bit of code is now interpreted to mean all adults. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/246 |
|
> The Supreme Court held:
> (1) The Second Amendment protects an individual right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia, and to use that arm for traditionally lawful purposes, such as self-defense within the home. Pp. 2–53.
> (a) The Amendment's prefatory clause announces a purpose, but does not limit or expand the scope of the second part, the operative clause. The operative clause's text and history demonstrate that it connotes an individual right to keep and bear arms. Pp. 2–22.
Per Wikipedia: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_v._Hell...